Why do we want to hold the government
 Accountable?

Holding the government accountable is crucial for several key reasons:

Upholding Democracy and the Rule of Law 
Protecting Citizens' Rights and Interests
Promoting Transparency and Trust
Ensuring Effective and Efficient Governance
Preventing Corruption and Misuse of Resources
Encouraging Citizen Engagement
Promoting Fairness and Justice

In summary, government accountability is fundamental for the functioning of a healthy democracy, ensuring that the government serves the public interest, operates transparently and effectively, and maintains the trust and confidence of its citizens.

So essentially what happened is, Colorado voters said NO, and the government decided to do it anyways? 

Yes, that's essentially correct. Colorado voters rejected Proposition HH, which proposed various changes to property taxes and state revenue limits. Despite this rejection, Governor Jared Polis called a special session of the Colorado State Legislature to address property tax relief. The legislature then passed, and the governor signed, legislation that included some of the measures initially proposed in Proposition HH.This legislation reduced the residential property tax assessment rate, increased the exemption on home value from taxation, and made changes to the Earned Income Tax Credit and TABOR refunds. These actions were taken independently of the voter's decision on Proposition HH​​.

The Colorado Taxpayer Bill of Rights, commonly referred to as TABOR, is an amendment to the state's constitution, enacted in 1992. It primarily aims to limit the amount of revenue that state and local governments in Colorado can retain and spend. Key provisions of TABOR include:

Revenue and Spending Limits: TABOR generally restricts the growth of government revenue and spending. It ties the increases in overall tax revenue to inflation and population growth unless larger increases are approved through a referendum​​​​.

Voter Approval Requirement: One of the notable aspects of TABOR is the requirement for voter approval for specific financial decisions. This includes voter approval for retaining and spending excess revenue, as well as for raising taxes. In the absence of such approval, excess revenue must be refunded to taxpayers​​​​.

Controversy and Criticism: TABOR has been a subject of controversy since its enactment. Critics, primarily from liberal groups, argue that the limitations imposed by TABOR have adversely impacted funding for essential services like schools and transportation. They contend that these restrictions have hamstrung the ability of the state to adequately fund public services​​.

Advocacy by Conservative and Libertarian Groups: TABOR is largely advocated by conservative and free market libertarian groups in the United States. These groups see TABOR as a means to limit the growth of government, in line with their principles of minimal government intervention in the economy​​.This amendment represents a unique approach to government spending and taxation, and its impacts have been a topic of debate in public policy circles.

Proposition HH, also known as the Property Tax Changes and Revenue Change Measure, was a legislatively referred state statute that appeared on Colorado's ballot on November 7, 2023. However, it was defeated by the voters. The proposition entailed various changes to state property taxes and revenue limits, which included:

Reduction of Property Tax Rates: It proposed to reduce property tax rates across the state​​.

Changes to TABOR Refunds: Proposition HH intended to allow the state to retain and spend revenues that would otherwise need to be refunded to residents under the Colorado Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR). This was a significant aspect of the proposition as it involved modifying the existing framework of TABOR​​.

Creation of New Revenue Cap: The proposition sought to establish a new, increased cap on state revenue, termed the Proposition HH Cap, which would enable the state to retain and utilize additional revenue each year up to this cap​​.

Allocation of Revenue to Local Governments: It aimed to allocate revenue to local governments to compensate for the decrease in property tax revenues, a process known as backfilling​​.

Limit on Local Government Property Tax Revenue: Proposition HH included provisions to create a limit on local government property tax revenue​​.This measure was necessary to obtain voter approval under TABOR, as it would have increased state revenue. It was introduced as Senate Bill 23-303 and passed in the Colorado State Legislature along partisan lines, with Democratic members in favor and Republican members opposed.

Governor Jared Polis signed the bill on May 24, 2023​​.
The proposition was surrounded by controversy and mixed opinions. Governor Polis advocated for it, citing the strong economy and TABOR surplus as opportunities to provide both school funding and property tax relief without compromising either.

In contrast, critics like State Rep. Mike Lynch and Michael Fields, president of the Advance Colorado Institute, argued that the proposition was another effort to improperly use TABOR refunds and expressed concerns about its impacts on property taxes and government revenue​​.

Following the rejection of Proposition HH, Colorado Governor Jared Polis convened a special session of the Colorado State Legislature to address property tax relief.

The legislature passed, and the governor signed, legislation that reduced the residential property tax assessment rate and increased the exemption on home value from taxation, among other changes​​.

Holding a government accountable for actions that may contradict the
electorate's decisions involves a mix of legal, political, and civic
strategies. For Colorado residents seeking to respond to the
government's actions regarding Proposition HH, here are some potential
avenues:

Legal Challenges:

Individuals or groups can file
lawsuits if they believe the government has acted unconstitutionally or
violated specific laws. This often involves challenging the legality of
the legislation on grounds such as exceeding authority, violating state
constitutional provisions, or procedural irregularities.

Learn More 

Public Advocacy and Campaigning

Organizing or participating in public advocacy campaigns, including
petitions, demonstrations, and public forums, can raise awareness and
pressure elected officials.

Learn More 

Media and Social Media Campaigns

Utilizing local and social media to spread information and rally support
can be an effective way to hold government accountable. This can also
include writing op-eds, letters to the editor, and using online
platforms to gather support.

Learn More 

Constitutional Violations

Arguing that the legislation
violates the state or federal constitution. This could include claims
that the legislation infringes on protected rights or exceeds the
government's constitutional authority.

Learn more 

Violation of State Laws or Procedures

Challenging the legislation on the grounds that it violates existing
state laws or was passed through a procedure that didn’t comply with
required legal processes.

Learn more 

Breach of the Public Trust Doctrine

Asserting that government officials have violated the public trust
doctrine, which requires them to act in the best interest of the public.

Learn more 

Misuse of Government Power

Claiming that the government misused its power or acted ultra vires (beyond its legal power).

Learn more